Sep 20, 2007

A Sense of Urgency--Business and Spiritual

This morning should be the last issue of The Kansas City Star newspaper that we receive, due to their support of abortion and other social causes (e.g., homosexuality, fetal stem cell research) to which we are opposed. I would have canceled years ago but my husband believed it was important to keep track of what was going on and the Star is really Kansas City's only major newspaper. That is typical of how my husband acts--with deliberation and caution--for which I am mostly (but not always!) thankful.

That said, today's Star has an article that describes a successful entrepreneur, Cliff Illig. The co-founder of Cerner Corporation, one of KC's largest businesses, is quoted:
If patience is your greatest virtue you’ll make a lousy entrepreneur. Impatience is a virtue. Have a constant sense of urgency.
I think Illig's advice is particularly applicable to changing one's life and following the path to sainthood. A sense of urgency is needed because we don't know how long a time the Lord will give us. It's easy to say I'll enjoy today and begin to sacrifice tomorrow. Or, I'm too busy to pray today, and I'll make it up tomorrow. Or, I'll eat the whole thing today and begin to diet tomorrow. Those are excuses--not signs of patience--and they simply don't work!

I would bet that most of the great saints had a well-developed sense of urgency. Relying on God's help through many prayers, they were quick to move to accomplish goals. St. Francis Xavier is probably the best example and he is said to have converted more people to Christianity than anyone since St. Paul. Mother Angelica also had a sense of urgency in creating EWTN to build a critical Catholic media for these times.

A century ago, St. Philippine Duchesne had a sense of spiritual urgency. A very short review of her dramatic life is found at Catholic Forum. Especially interesting is the fact that she only left France to be a missionary to the Indians in the Louisiana Purchase at the age of 49--not a young age to begin this kind of work!

A pilgrimage to the Shrine of St. Philippine Duchesne will start on Saturday, September 22, 2007 with 10 a.m. Mass at Sacred Heart Church in Mound City, KS. Afterwards, pilgrims will walk (good shoes needed!) to the outdoor Shrine for lunch (bring your own, including drinks). This annual event will end with Stations of the Cross and is sponsored by the Latin Mass Community of St. Philippine Duchesne at Blessed Sacrament Church in Kansas City, KS. Directions to Mound City from Kansas City: South on 69 Hwy to 52 West, then 5 miles west on Hwy 52.

Sep 10, 2007

The Baby Snooks Show

In the 1940s I enjoyed sitting on the floor and listening to the radio with my parents and siblings. One evening program that I especially liked featured a mischievous little girl who, with a lot of imagination, constantly drove her father crazy. She told "stories", always asked "why", and tried to change the subject when she knew she had done something wrong.

When Baby Snooks got into trouble, she would make the wildest of excuses, or pretend she didn't know why her father was mad at her. Sometimes, the program would end with her bawling because Daddy had to spank her.

I remember laughing a lot when the program began and I heard the tiny child's voice of Baby Snooks, who was played by comedienne, Fanny Brice. The actress was actually over 40 years older than the character she portrayed, and she even dressed in a child's clothes when she appeared at the microphone. When Brice died suddenly, my Mother told a very disappointed young girl (me!) there would be no more Baby Snooks Shows.

Until today, I didn't know that it was possible to re-listen to some of these wonderfully funny episodes. [One of the writers of Baby Snooks was Jess Oppenheimer, later the producer and head writer of I Love Lucy]. If you have nine minutes to smile and laugh, listen to "Missing Dollar" or "New Car" or one of the other recordings of Baby Snooks Shows made during 1940-1951.

Sep 3, 2007

Outside the Church, There is No Salvation

Erick asks that I publish a post on the Catholic teaching, "Outside the Church, there is no salvation" [Latin: 'Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus' (EENS)]. My original post, What Catholics do NOT Believe, recommended an EWTN website that republished seven points written in 1884, including:
7. Catholics do not believe that Protestants who are baptized, who lead a good life, love God and their neighbor, and are blamelessly ignorant of the just claims of the Catholic Religion to be the one true Religion (which is called being in good faith), are excluded from Heaven, provided they believe that there is one God in three Divine Persons; *that God will duly reward the good and punish the wicked; that Jesus Christ is the Son of God made man, who redeemed us, and in whom we must trust for our salvation; and provided they thoroughly repent of having ever, by their sins, offended God.
I'm a little confused on why there is a question on whether baptized Protestants are excluded from heaven, especially when there is a clear statement that they repent of having offended God. Moreover, baptism can be administered by anyone without regard to age, sex, religion, etc., so long as the matter (flowing water), intention (to do what Jesus and His Church intends), and form ("I baptize you in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit") are correct.

Erick continues his comment:
So most importantly, I'd like to hear from educated parties as to what the position of the SSPX is on EENS. Why? Well, because the long-awaited Motu Proprio on the Tridentine Latin Mass has finally been published, and many folks throughout the world are expecting to see a proclamation of some kind regarding the canonical status of the SSPX folks within the Catholic Church. I believe that the SSPX's views on EENS will be key to any further discussions and/or publications from the Holy Father regarding the SSPX.

So, I've been reading many SSPX publications lately, given this prospect of new discussions between Rome and the SSPX. And within the SSPX's publications, I have read what appear to be extreme views on EENS; to the effect that only Catholics within the Holy Roman Catholic Church may be saved. Now, I am well-versed on the concept of EENS and its history within the Catholic Church, and I would like to use your forum to clear up for me whether or not the SSPX holds to an extreme position on EENS. I particularly welcome comments from SSPX folks themselves on this issue, should you agree to start a post on my suggested topic here.
I don't know what Erick has read, but the SSPX clearly refutes Fr. Leonard Feeney's challenge to the traditional Catholic understanding of three types of Baptism. [Fr. Feeney and his condemned teaching on baptism is described here.] An even more thorough presentation by the SSPX can be found in The Three Baptisms. The SSPX believes and teaches that Baptism can be instituted through water, desire, and blood. Archbishop Lefebvre would turn over in his grave if his SSPX did not accept the three means of Baptism.

The Three Baptisms published by the SSPX specifically notes that a person can be baptized by desire:
Saint Augustine, who held it because he once heard a sermon of Saint Ambrose, "On the Death of Valentinian" in which the saint states that the unbaptized 20-year-old emperor, who was murdered in the Alps while on his way to be baptized by Ambrose, had saved his soul because of his ardent desire for baptism and his supernatural virtue. In that sermon written by Saint Ambrose, he writes:

"But I hear that you mourn, because he did not receive the sacrament of baptism ... Does he not have the grace that he desired; does he not have what he asked for? Certainly what he asked for, he received. And hence it says ‘But the just man, if he be prevented with death, shall be in rest’’ [Wis. 4:7] (PL 16, 1374).

Very few have challenged St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Alphonsus Ligouri, and St. Robert Bellarmine on baptism of desire. The current problem that Erick is referring to likely involves modernist interpretations of "baptism of desire" that allow the flimsiest understanding of a person's desire to be baptized.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states the traditional meaning of baptism of desire:
For catechumens who die before their Baptism, their explicit desire to receive it, together with repentance for their sins, and charity, assures them the salvation that they were not able to receive through the sacrament. (1259)
Things get hazy when "desire" can be considered as implicit, rather than explicit. I am concerned when "implicit" desire is used to say that a cannibal, who "following his conscience" in "invincible ignorance" kills, roasts, and eats his enemies, can attain heaven. Sorry, but I am not persuaded.

Yes, I know that St. Thomas Aquinas states that the desire for Baptism can be either explicit or implicit, but he defines "implicit" as "contained" in something else (and I don't think he meant "contained" in a false religion!).
"Properly speaking, that is called IMPLICIT in which many things are CONTAINED AS IN ONE, and that is called explicit in which each of the things is considered in itself.” (Of Truth 14, 11)
I read Gary Potter's fairly objective book, After the Boston Heresy Case, in the late 1990s. The book is helpful in showing the confusion and errors associated with a modern understanding of an "implicit" desire to be baptized.

Sep 1, 2007

Arguments with a Philanderer

John C. Wright is in the middle of the fray again and takes on an excuse-making philanderer in a question and answer format. A few explicit words, but they are rightly used. I suspect that some blog writings of ex-atheist Wright may become a new book of apologia for Reason and Reality that will emulate the writings of St. Augustine, John Henry Cardinal Newman, and C.S. Lewis. Wright will have the advantage of hearing the pro and nay comments of many of his listeners before the final script is written, including 87+ responses on the current post. Here's an extract:
The problem is that ideas have consequences: one cannot approve of philandering without disapproving of chastity; and one cannot disapprove of chastity without coming to disapprove, sooner or later, of innocence; and one cannot disapprove of innocence, without, sooner or later, coming to disapprove of children, motherhood, patriotism, wholesomeness, beauty in art and logic in philosophy, and eventually all the other good and natural things in life.

The same argument you give to excuse philandering can be used, word for word, to excuse cowardice, cannibalism, opium-smoking, bear-baiting, suicide or any other vice or injustice.

My Favorite Prayer

When I was younger, my favorite prayer was the ACT OF CONSECRATION TO THE SACRED HEART OF JESUS. My parents, siblings, and I used to recite this prayer every Thursday evening at the weekly Novena. I continue to like it especially because of the detailed invocations for redemption of the enemies of Christ and His Church.

Catholic Online says the prayer was authorized by Pope Pius XI, which is consistent with Fr. Lasance's footnote in Let Us Go to Jesus. The small vest pocket prayerbook notes this particular Consecration to the Sacred Heart was
"issued on October 17, 1925 by His Holiness Pope Pius XI, for the annual consecration of the human race to the Sacred Heart on the feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ, King, the last Sunday of October."
As I get closer to the end of my life on earth, my favorite prayer has become "HOPE AND CONFIDENCE IN GOD." Even though I appreciate the saintly paths of individuals who guide us by their example and teaching, I know Jesus came to save sinners. Consequently, hope in the incarnate Savior, the second Person of the Holy Trinity, is paramount in my life.
HOPE AND CONFIDENCE IN GOD

My God, I believe most firmly that Thou watches over
All who hope in Thee,
And that we can want for nothing when
We rely upon Thee in all things;
Therefore I am resolved for the future to have no anxieties,
And to cast all my cares upon Thee.
"In peace in the self-same I will sleep and I will rest;
For Thou, O Lord,
Singularly hast settled me in hope."

Men may deprive me of worldly goods and of honors;
Sickness may take from me my strength
And the means of serving Thee;
I may even lose Thy grace by sin;
But my trust shall never leave me.
I will preserve it to the last moment of my life,
And the powers of hell shall seek in vain
To wrest it from me.
"In peace in the self-same I will sleep and I will rest."

Let others seek happiness in their wealth, in their talents;
Let them trust in the purity of their lives,
The severity of their mortifications,
To the number of their good works,
The fervor of their prayers;
As for me, O my God, in my very confidence
Lies all my hope.
"For Thou, O Lord, singularly hast settled me in hope."
This confidence can never be in vain,
"No one has hoped in the Lord and has been confounded."

I am assured, therefor, of my eternal happiness,
For I firmly hope for it,
And all my hope is in Thee.
"In Thee, O Lord, have I hoped;
Let me never be confounded."

I know, alas, I know but too well
That I am frail and changeable;
I know the power of temptation against the strongest virtue.
I have seen stars fall from heaven,
And pillars of the firmament totter;
But these things alarm me not.
While I hope in Thee,
I am sheltered from all misfortune,
And I am sure that my trust shall endure,
For I rely upon Thee to sustain this unfailing hope.

Finally, I know that my confidence cannot exceed Thy bounty,
And that I shall never receive less than I have hoped for from Thee.
Therefore, I hope that Thou wilt sustain me
Against my evil inclinations;
That Thou wilt protect me
Against the most furious assaults of the evil one,
And that Thou will cause my weakness
To triumph over my most powerful enemies.

I hope that Thou wilt never cease to love me,
And that I shall love Thee unceasingly,
"In Thee, O Lord, have I hoped,
Let me never be confounded."

Aug 29, 2007

Catholic Bioethics

One of my children sent me an email with news from The Guardian that "Britain's leading scientists have made a final plea for the right to create the first animal-human embryos for medical research using eggs taken from dead cows." The genetic material from the cow egg is removed and DNA from a human cell is inserted. The article continues:

The Catholic Church has made clear its opposition. Bishops told the parliamentary committee scrutinising a draft bill to allow the research to go ahead, that they opposed the creation of any embryo solely for research - they believe that all life begins at conception. They said they were also anxious to limit the destruction of such life once it had been brought into existence.

In a submission to the committee, they said: 'At the very least, embryos with a preponderance of human genes should be assumed to be embryonic human beings, and be treated accordingly.'

Bioethics is an increasingly important subject for study and decision-making within the Catholic Church. The life issues of contraception, abortion, suicide, euthanasia, stem-cell research, and cloning have been reasonably well addressed, but other scientific developments affecting the initiation of a human (or semi-human) life will need to be dealt with. It seems that the Bishops of Britain, in commenting that "a preponderance of human genes" is sufficient to classify the organism as human may need additional bioethical arguments.

Synthetic biology is dedicated to the development of non-natural living beings, and once long DNA sequences can be cheaply designed and built, this technology will be transformed into a tool with enormous profit potential. DNA sequences (genetic instructions) are designed to accomplish a specific purpose and are inserted into cells that can replicate. Coded sequences of the DNA letters A, T, C, and G can instruct the organism to make a pharmaceutical or a fuel--or do other things. [However, the insertion of a genome into an egg is a different matter for bioethical consideration, if either the genome or the egg originates from a human being.]

Perhaps it is time to quickly review recombinant DNA, DNA constructed from two or more sources (e.g., animal and plant, human and animal, plant and human) and incorporated into recombinant cells that can reproduce. The Catholic Church has not objected to recombinant DNA technology when it is used to manufacture "drugs" in a pharmaceutical "factory," even though the factory uses recombinant E. coli, mammalian cells, and yeast to manufacture many human proteins. Examples include:

* insulin for diabetics
* factor VIII for males suffering from hemophilia A
* factor IX for hemophilia B
* human growth hormone (GH)
* erythropoietin (EPO) for treating anemia
* three types of interferons
* several interleukins
* granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for stimulating the bone marrow after a bone marrow transplant
* granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stimulating neutrophil production, e.g., after chemotherapy and for mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells from the bone marrow into the blood. * tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) for dissolving blood clots
* adenosine deaminase (ADA) for treating some forms of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)
* angiostatin and endostatin for trials as anti-cancer drugs
* parathyroid hormone
* leptin
* hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) to vaccinate against the hepatitis B virus
* C1 inhibitor (C1INH) used to treat hereditary angioneurotic edema (HANE)
[Above list from here.]

Some have argued against human DNA being inserted into plant cells. I'm not sure if there is any moral difference between a technology that manufactures human proteins using animal cells and another technology using plant cells. If one technology is good (or evil), then the other is too. The question of good or evil is a bioethical one that needs much further discussion in the Catholic Church.

I recognize that genetically modified plants in the open environment will spread into the environment more quickly than modified E. coli recombinant cells grown in fermentation vats in controlled laboratories. This is a critical issue if certain recombinant cells were to be manufactured by terrorists to kill people, their sustenance, or livelihoods. That's why our country spends a huge amount of money on biological defense. Google "agricultural bioterrorism" and you'll be able to imagine a lot of nasty scenarios.

With regard to constructing specialized plant and animal organisms, I personally am more worried about the potential loss of certain plant and animal populations because poorer types will no longer be grown and the diverse genetic pool will be diminished. [Of course that has already happened with selecting the most suitable seeds and animals for human nutrients, and multiple copies of genetic libraries might be able to deal with this issue.]

New bioethical issues will hopefully be addressed properly by the National Catholic Bioethics Center. The NCBC "conducts research, consultation, publishing and education to promote human dignity in health care and the life sciences, and derives its message directly from the teachings of the Catholic Church." Ethics & Medics is a monthly commentary on ethical issues in health care and the life sciences published by the NCBC. I haven't read any issues, but the web masthead states:
The Center's staff consults regularly on life science issues and medical issues with the Vatican, the U.S. bishops and public policy-makers, hospitals and international organizations of all faiths. Vatican agencies including the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Pontifical Academy for Life and the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers consult with the Center to help formulate magisterial teaching.
The primary NCBC contributor to discussions of bioethical issues is a relatively young priest (from his photo), Father Tad Pacholczyk, Director of Education. I've read a couple of his monthly columns and have been mostly impressed that he has the Catholic faith and scientific knowledge to adequately and correctly instruct others on Catholic bioethics. The priest contends that "Bioethics is an exceedingly important discipline for the future of our society, addressing critical issues in science and life. This discipline cannot afford to compromise its integrity as new controversies arise, selling its soul to the highest bidder or playing to powerful special-interest groups like universities or biotech companies."

I hope the NCBC expands its work to assess recent scientific efforts to create new and adapted organisms that combine genes from human beings, animals, and plants. Mostly, I hope they are guided by the Holy Spirit to be correct in their guidance to others in this critical endeavor.

Aug 23, 2007

What Catholics Do NOT Believe!

The year 1884 is the date when my beloved Grandmother was born, so I'm always interested in HOW the Catholic Church taught its eternal truths during that period. EWTN reprints from a 1884 discussion by the Very Rev. Joseph Di Bruno, D.D. on what Catholics do NOT believe.

Two of the total list of seven items include:

4. Catholics do not believe that a man can by his own good works, independently of the Merits and Passion of Jesus Christ and of His grace, obtain salvation, or make any satisfaction for the guilt of his sins, or acquire any merit.

...

6. Catholics do not believe that it is in the power of the Church to add to the truths contained in the "deposit of faith," that is, to frame or enforce any doctrine which has not for its source the written or unwritten word of God, or authority from the same. Nor do they believe, when the Church makes a Definition in matters of faith, that this definition or article of faith is a new doctrine; it is only a solemn declaration and a clearer statement of what was believed, at least implicitly (that is, in an implied way, or inferentially), in the time of the Apostles, though some private persons might have doubted of it.

Now, read the remaining five here.

Cures Without Cloning

The good Missourians who worked very hard and almost stopped the multi-million dollar juggernaut financed by James Stowers to pass the pro-cloning amendment have no intention of failing again. Their new website, MoCuresWithoutCloning.com, should be checked often. WolfTracker gives more information on the new anti-cloning initiative.

Patron Saint of Weight Watchers

St. Mochta is a good patron saint for all of us who wish to curb their appetites for spiritual advantage and control their weight for physical motives. Butler's "The Lives of the Saints" notes that St. Mochta (Mochteus) never ate a morsel of fat as a way of curbing his appetite for such foods. [Note: some liquid oils are necessary for good health.]

The result was that the Abbot Mochta lived a very long life, fabled to be three hundred years (but the evidence is that he lived to be about ninety). St. Mochta was a contemporary of St Patrick, who is said to have built the original church in Louth, Ireland and to have appointed St Mochta the first Bishop of Louth.

Search on the word "eat" and note that Google keeps bringing up the word "death", in which "eat" are the middle letters. Now search on the two words together and see that Americans Eat Themselves to Death:
...inactive Americans are eating themselves to death at an alarming rate, their unhealthy habits fast approaching tobacco as the top underlying preventable cause of death, a government study found.

In 2000, poor diet including obesity and physical inactivity caused 400,000 U.S. deaths - more than 16 percent of all deaths and the No. 2 killer. That compares with 435,000 for tobacco, or 18 percent, as the top underlying killer.
Obesity is highly related to health problems such as daily stomach acid reflux, knee replacements, feet problems, heart attacks, and diabetes. Should the government then partially subsidize weight loss programs for obese persons? Private health insurance companies usually do not cover obesity treatments, even those known to be highly effective, yet costing as little as $12/week, such as Weight Watchers. Until 2004, the government-sponsored Medicare did not consider obesity to be a disease or illness and would not authorize any payments or services to treat obesity.

I wonder if more health bang for the buck wouldn't be generated by allowing deductions for taxpayers' enrollment in programs similar to Weight Watchers. Should the government allow individuals to subtract expenses for an approved weight loss program from their gross income, before paying income tax? Why? Or why not? I'd like to hear your opinion.

Aug 15, 2007

Utopia and Stranger in a Strange Land

"Robert Heinlein in STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND wrote a work of propaganda, which was meant to, and in my case did, persuade the reader to adopt a philosophy that was false." -- John C. Wright at his Journal. [Note: the famous science fiction novel, Stranger in a Strange Land, proposes cannibalism as a virtue. John C. Wright explains what is wrong with the book in a previous post of his Journal. The discussion continues below.]

"And did you start eating your friends as a gesture of respect as a result?"

No, but the libertarian moral-relativism he [Heinlein] deliberately (and successfully) persuaded me [Wright] to adopt, left me without an ability to say what [why] cannibalism was wrong, or polygamy, or incest. His stated aim was to undermine monogamy and monotheism. One way to do this is to feign total innocence when confronted by total wickedness: to ask (with wide-eyed naivety) why cannibalism or incest is wrong, and, if the answer requires any value judgment, to dismiss the value judgment as arbitrary, ergo of no moral weight.

Once one has no confidence in the reasoning about what is morally obvious, those things that are morally obscure become cloudy as well. For many years, I saw nothing wrong with perversion, fornication, polygamy, open adultery, and so on. That was Heinlein's rhetorical purpose.

Heinlein did not get me to be a cannibal, but he did persuade me to throw away the moral code I used to say cannibalism is wrong. Of course he did not give a tinker's damn about cannibalism: it was my judgment, my sense of reason, my sense of proportion, that he wanted me to scuttle.

I submit that the one leads to the other: a moral standard that is neutral on the question of cannibalism is perforce neutral on every lesser standard. I challenge you or anyone to prove me wrong. To prove me wrong, all you need do is give me an argument, starting from a Heinlein axiom that all men should be free to do whatsoever they will, provided it does no violence to another, to show clearly, and without any arbitrary value judgments, why cannibalism of a willing victim is wrong, or incest with a willing daughter, or any other victimless crime.

If you cannot do it, then you have been deceived, and harmed, by the same school of thought that deceived and harmed me: and it is this school of which Heinlein, at least in science fiction circles, was the foremost advocate.

I responded on the above post by Wright to ask:
Was that philosophy Utopianism? This "perennial heresy" is the basis for many hypothetical future worlds where the vices of lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy, and pride have disappeared (or in some instances, made into virtues). The corresponding virtues of chastity, abstinence, liberality, diligence, patience, kindness, and humility that have been the foundation of prior civilizations are usually ignored.

Utopians believe human beings are perfectible. These thinkers are at odds with REALITY and believe in the deification of mankind. Yet our permanently imperfect society is incapable of reaching an ultra-human state because of the extreme tensions between what we want, what we can achieve, and what is good for us. [You can argue all day on that last one!]

In contrast, non-Utopians (religionists) have a much higher regard for REALITY because they conclude that, if mankind sinned consistently over the past 10,000 years, mankind's imperfections will be disturbingly evident over the next 10,000 years. The root of Utopianism is a great pride, never a good starting point to find truth. Moreover, Utopia is a world where freedom must be severely constrained for the benefit of all. The Utopian must dissolve personalities which individualities are the cause of disagreements between peoples.

Sci-Fi authors, in their Utopianism, regularly insist that humanity will be transformed into a community of saintly scientists and philosophers, all joined together in a collectively high intelligence. [THE GOLDEN TRANSCENDENCE is an example.] In reality, dreams of Utopianism are nightmares where no change can be tolerated within a person's life or within a society.

Philosophy attempts to understand mankind, but science cannot understand the non-objective parts of man's reasoning. Even if science is perfectible, mankind is not perfectible because philosophy is not perfectible. Or if it is, man's weaknesses prevent him from knowing or acknowledging philosophical truths.

I recently asked a professor of philosophy what philosophical ideas were new and original, so that he and others could meet requirements for "new, published research." He laughed and said there was nothing new in philosophy. He and other professors could only write about philosophical thoughts presented and studied in the past, yet with "new" organization and comparisons. I was heartened to hear this old professor insist that philosophy is well worth studying because it contemplates God, mankind, the universe, knowledge, and values.
Original Sin needs to be mentioned here, but others have written more succinctly on the topic here and here.

Aug 12, 2007

The Identity of a Pig

Over 50 years ago, a radio program sponsored a national contest to find the person with the funniest name. The lady who won had the name of Ima Haug. Her original name was something like Ima Huntington, but she married a man with the last name of Haug.

I've thought the name as very fitting for most of us human beings, as the nature of a swine can be compared to both the best and the worst characteristics of the human race. Regardless of the stories of beautiful pigs given large clean spaces in which to roam and root, pigs do not groom themselves (like a cat), eat with no regard for what or how much, always have dirty noses, and defecate in their living area. I too can resemble a pig in being spiritually dirty, especially before I go to confession to ask the priest to forgive my sins.

When I was very small, I hated to have to take a bath because it shortened my outdoor play time. My Mother finally solved the problem when she bought a book with 365 small childrens' stories to be read nightly. The one-page story on my birth date had a drawing that impressed me. The picture was of another little girl who also hated baths. In the story, the little girl refused to take a bath and was punished by having to sleep with the pigs. I was asked by my Mother after the story if I would agree to take a bath, and of course, my answer was now 'yes'.

When I was growing up, we raised a few pigs, so I was aware how dirty they were. Their pen was always foul-smelling from spilled slop and hog manure. Moreover, it was not easy to recover the manure to fertilize farm fields and gardens, as we did with cow manure and chicken manure. So the pig manure had little value, except to eventually fertilize the area for planting a new garden, after moving the hog pen to another spot.

Pigs do have have numerous advantages over beef cattle.
  1. Pigs are omnivores so they will eat anything from soapy dishwater to dirt (which they consume when they find roots).
  2. Lots of baby pigs are born in a litter. I once observed 12 or 13 small piglets born to a large sow on an in-law's farm. Even the sow's owner was amazed that the baby pigs kept coming out!
  3. Pigs grow fast and produce pork chops, ham, and bacon--and these taste very good, especially when I smoke them.
  4. Pigs may produce replacement parts for human beings in the future because of their genetic similarity to human beings (and several other factors).
Pigs are also a problem. In both Hawaii and Texas, residents told me that hunting wild pigs is encouraged. Why? Because wild boars are mean and dangerous, the pigs carry dangerous diseases, and they tear up farmland and manicured grassy areas.

In Hawaii, the native Islanders are allowed to kill wild hogs whenever they want. The native told me that wild pigs cause a significant amount of soil erosion on the Big Island. In Texas, dogs are used to hunt wild swine, although the man I spoke with said good dogs are often killed by wild hogs. The man recommended an alternative method to keep wild hogs from disturbing manicured grassy areas.

He suggested digging a ditch in a nearby area, dropping in a bushel of corn, and covering with packed soil. The wild hogs will smell the corn and come at night to root it out, leaving the unfenced grassy area alone. It would take a while before all the kernals would be found by the wild pigs. The man actually believed it was possible to train the wild pigs to eat only in areas where corn was used as reward. He thought this method would meet the demands of animal lovers who would raise a howl if wild hogs were simply shot.

Aug 11, 2007

Lovers of the Latin Mass, Read This!

Read St. Louis Catholic's post comparing the characters in The Incredibles movie to the players in the Motu Proprio. Don't miss it!

Canning Vegetables

Canning vegetables from the garden is always hard work, but the end products are usually better than you can buy in the grocery store. I've been busy canning pickles (27 quart jars) and corn relish (5 pints). I also froze fresh tomatoes that had been blanched so that the skin easily slid off. The whole tomatoes were then cored and packed in sandwich bags for the freezer.

The outdoor temps have been in the 90s, but indoor air conditioning now makes canning a relatively easy chore. I remember when both the indoor and outdoor temperatures were very hot and my Mother canned different vegetables and fruits. One year, she canned 82 pints of strawberry preserves because the berries were too small (or too close to rotting from too much rain) to sell. We kids had to stem box after box of them! Naturally, we enjoyed strawberry preserves on bread all year long--even as sandwiches in our packed lunches for school.

Mother canned pickles, corn, green beans, peaches, and especially tomato juice. One of our daughters borrowed her Grandmother's colander and wood paddle to make tomato juice. The paddle is rotated around and around inside the colander to push the cooked tomato pulp through, and leave the unwanted seeds inside the colander. Our daughter concluded the intensive effort was not worth it, considering the grocery store price for tomato juice and paste. However, homemade tomato juice definitely tastes better than store-bought juice.

Soap was also made by Mother and her mother and grandmother. Mother said the recipe for soap was printed on the side of the box of lye. One year her Dad didn't get around to killing a young hog during the cold butchering season. He had to wait until the next winter to butcher that hog. Mother remembers that the large hog was very fat, and they made a lot of soap from the buckets of lard. I imagine the soap recipe was much like that described by a lady born about the same time as my Mother.

Aug 3, 2007

Fallen-Away Catholics

Most of you have probably met Catholics who have fallen away from the Church. Frequently, they began to reject Catholicism by becoming angry with a priest, or becoming upset by money handling in the Church, or any of a hundred other reasons.

I've talked twice with J., an old man (my age!), and he told me today that he is a fallen-away Catholic. He is disgusted by the priests' sexual scandals of the past few years, but I concluded he left the Church a long time before the scandals made the headlines. J. added that he wasn't sure he now believed everything the Church teaches (perhaps another indication that his departure is of some duration). Yet he noted that he could never join another church because he would always consider himself a Catholic. Finally, J. mentioned that if a priest cousin from another area were to be in Kansas City, he would go to Mass every Sunday to hear his excellent sermons!

Whatever the reason (excuse!) for losing his faith, J.'s rejection of the Church MAY have begun, as so often happens, by rejecting the 6th and 9th Commandments. It is so difficult to admit that one is sinning when it feels so good and seems so right!

There are a lot of arguments to justify sinful sexual behaviors. "It's my nature and only natural to do it." "No one is being hurt." "This is such a small sin in comparison to the sin of hatred." "No one can obey these commandments, so why even try." "Jesus really didn't mean what He said." After sufficiently ruminating over different variations of these excuses, a person's conscience becomes twisted, he concludes the Church is wrong, and he leaves the Church.

Sometimes, God's grace is restored and a person become aware of the spiritual battle for his soul that is inherent in sexual temptations. He realizes he is excusing his sins, but God isn't! When he admits "through my fault, through my fault, through my most grievous fault", and asks for God's mercy, he can begin to be truly repentant.

Sexual temptations and falling into sins make a person uncomfortably aware of his fallibility--his lack of strength. A person cannot rely on his own strength in repelling this kind of sin. In fact, the Church teaches we must always run away from a sexual temptation; we must never stop and consider the temptation even in order to fight it.

Sexual sins can become the occasion for the virtue of humility--I blew it again, God! Only when we are so humble that we admit we are powerless without God, can His grace enter to change a life. A wise person recognizes this for the remainder of his time on earth.

The only persons represented in the four Gospels who really pleased Jesus Christ were repentant sinners. First was the man in the parable who stayed in the back of the temple, with his eyes cast down and confessing he was unworthy. Second was the man who told Jesus, "I am not worthy that Thou should come unto my roof; but say the word and my servant will be healed." Third was St. Dismas who hung on the cross next to Jesus and who admitted he deserved his crucifixion because of his crimes, but nevertheless, begged Jesus in a great act of faith to remember him when he came into his kingdom. Jesus' response was that "This day you will be with me in paradise." Quite a reward after a man's bad life, but one that was entirely mitigated by acknowledging personal sins and pleading for mercy from Jesus!

When I was young, my parents lived next door to Mr. & Mrs. M. They were Catholics who had rejected the Church's teaching on the permanence of marriage, and their "marriage" was not true in the sight of God. For many years, they lived together as man and wife. Yet I always saw them at Sunday Mass where they sat in a middle pew on the left side of the Church, even though they never received Holy Communion. On Thursday evenings, we attended Novena devotions and Mr. & Mrs. M also were always there.

I asked my Mother about their situation, and was told Mr. & Mrs. M. were living in sin, but could find no way out of their situation because of a child they both needed to care for. The priest was gentle, but firm, in saying they were to hope in God's mercy by otherwise living a good life. The pastor encouraged the couple to come to him in the confessional where he would encourage them and guide them in spiritual practices and good works. However, their sins were never able to be forgiven because they continued to live together.

Many years later, Mr. & Mrs. M began to receive Holy Communion, and I asked Mother what had happened. She answered they were now old and the pastor had accepted the practicality of their desire to live together in the same house, but only as brother and sister.

Both Mr. & Mrs. M were kind and generous people. Mrs. M took care of her sick and very difficult-to-care-for mother for several years before the mother died. My own Mother thought Mrs. M behaved as a saint in this long trial. Mr. M was always first to help his neighbors, and the whole neighborhood missed them when they died. Both Mr. & Mrs M. left this world and were buried in full communion with the Church, even though their original spouses still lived. God's mercy prevailed for poor, humble, and repentant sinners!

Aug 2, 2007

The "Best of Times," the "Worst of Times"

I recently met some old classmates from my high school of 50+ years ago. Both men said that we had lived during the "best of times," referring to the rosy economic conditions that we had enjoyed. One remarked solemnly that our children and grandchildren will never enjoy as good fruits as we have eaten in our lifetimes.

I agreed, but also thought that like the time of the French Revolution described by Charles Dickens, the past 60 years were also the "worst of times." Public morality and personal integrity and responsibility are clearly at a low point. Regardless of whether one agrees on the causes, the effects mean more children have less--spiritually and economically--than did the children of two generations ago.

Two old friends and I discussed the above observations at lunch a couple of days ago. I asked these elderly women how many old people living on Social Security were giving part of their monthly check to their children and grandchildren. Both women agreed that this was happening more and more, as young people have fewer and fewer good jobs.

One friend continues to work at Walmart and noted she is seeing grandparents buy a significant part of their grandchildren's needs. She said she was shocked that so many grandmothers are now buying school supplies for their grandchildren. We concluded that Social Security is now paying for more than the oldest generation, it is now helping to pay for the youngest generation.

Yesterday I talked to another friend in a parking lot and she explained her son and his wife are working very hard at three jobs to support themselves and their two young children. The son has begun his own business of laying carpet and doing other home maintenance work, but they can't afford to move out of his mother's house where they live in her basement. The man is in his early 40's and has hired several employees. When he pays them, they buy drugs and don't show up the next day, and his business suffers. Now his mother says that she hopes he gives up the business and simply tries to get a maintenance position for apartments run by a Protestant church. Regardless, it sounds like the young family will continue to be supported in their housing needs by his widowed mother.

I would bet much more than a nickel that there are many, many stories like the above. They do not predict a bright future for a large number of young people in our country.

Jul 22, 2007

Exorcizing Harry Potter

Who's afraid of the fastest selling fiction in modern history, the seven-novel, 325-million books in the Harry Potter saga? Is it the buyers of the 12 million advance copies of the newest J.K. Rowling book? No, it is the 3rd National Conference of Catholic Exorcists that met in Mexico City, July 16-20, 2007.

Almost 300 priests and others involved in exorcisms listened to international experts, including Fr. Gabriel Amorth, the Vatican's chief exorcist, and the author of An Exorcist Tells His Story, and An Exorcist: More Stories. The agenda of the conference focused on a systematic course of instruction for priests who have responsibility for the Church's mandate by Christ to perform exorcisms.

Sixteen conference sessions and a case study were scheduled:
  1. The rebellious fall of the angels, according to Scripture, the Fathers of the church, Catholic theology, and Church teaching. What truths do demons affirm under the pressure of God during the exorcisms?
  2. Demonology and Satanism (dogmatic teaching) According to the Church: Who are they? What can they do? What is understood by demonic possession?
  3. Practical criteria for the exercise of the Rite of Exorcism, including the instructions given by Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI) in September 2000.
  4. The Exorcism of Jesus and a discussion of seven cases of true possession.
  5. Demonic possession, as contrasted with physical and mental diseases. Causes, aims, varieties and degrees, limits, and distinctions between obsession, humiliation, oppression and possession.
  6. True pathologies as compared to demonic possession. Natural development of the human being: personality, traumas, and upheavals.
  7. Discernment in the Bible and the Tradition of the Church. Natural, preternatural, and supernatural events. Ordinary and extraordinary actions of a demon.
  8. Discernment in particular: Spiritual versus psychological occurrences. Errors that an Exorcist can commit and the vigilance needed to properly care for the patient.
  9. The relationship of the Exorcist to the diocese. Pastoral collaboration at the diocesan level.
  10. The required spiritual condition and training of the Exorcist.
  11. A historical overview of exorcisms in the Roman ritual.
  12. A review of the new Rite of Exorcism (1999 and 2da.), including 2004 typical edition.
  13. Pastoral recommendations for the team who accomplish the exorcism.
  14. Liturgical and canonical aspects to observe in the exercise of the greater and smaller exorcism.
  15. The ministry of the Exorcist
  16. Positive and practical conclusions, according to the practice and norms of the new Rite of Exorcism. What remains to be done?
  17. Discernment of a case with the participation of medical doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, and exorcists, in that order--with each to diagnose the patient according to his own training.
The exorcist coordinator of the Archdiocese of Mexico City, Fr. Pedro Mendoza, claimed at the above conference that the Harry Potter books allow the devil to enter children's minds to do "a lot of damage." "If you put all these ideas in a child's head, that he can become a wizard, the child believes that, and that is opening an avenue through which the devil can get in."

Fr. Gabrielle Nanni, the author of Exorcisms, noted that it is in magic and the occult where the presence of the devil is found. A third expert, Rev. Francisco Bamonte, commented that the Harry Potter books and films are a clear attempt to attract adolescents to admire and involve themselves in magic. Fr. Bamonte is an Italian exorcism expert and author of Diabolical Possessions and Exorcisms who is disturbed that witches and warlocks are identified as positive figures, and that "magical solutions" to life's problems are presented in the Harry Potter books.

In 2006, the Vatican's chief exorcist, Rev. Gabriele Amorth, warned readers about the dangers of the Harry Potter novels. "You start off with Harry Potter, who comes across as a likable wizard, but you end up with the Devil. There is no doubt that the signature of the Prince of Darkness is clearly within these books." "By reading Harry Potter, a young child will be drawn into magic and from there it is a simple step to Satanism and the Devil."

Fr. Amorth made very similar remarks in 2002, "Behind Harry Potter hides the signature of the king of the darkness, the devil." Magic is a "satanic art" and there is no distinction between black and white magic, both of whom turn to the devil. In either case, becoming familiar with magic by reading the Harry Potter books makes magic appear less of the threat it is to a good relationship with God.

Personally, I would compare the Harry Potter books to playing Russian Roulette. For some kids, the books are fun to read and the bullets mostly miss their target. However, bullets hit some adolescents and encourage them to engage in magic--just like Harry Potter does. That's why Exorcists in the U.S. are recently seeing more diabolical possession that begins with ouija boards, Tarot cards, seances, and other occult activities. Why play Russian Roulette with the spiritual life of a child?

Jul 19, 2007

The Motu Proprio and Coca Cola Classic

Curmudgeon is at his best in this amusing post comparing Pope Benedict XVI's Motu Proprio bringing back the Latin Mass to the return of Coca Cola Classic. Humor and parody are often helpful in achieving a better understanding.

New Chinese Archbishop of Beijing

As usual, I learned a lot reading a recent post and associated comments on Fr. Z's blog. He quotes from AsiaNews that describes the Beijing diocesan community selection of a successor to the communist puppet Archbishop of Beijing who died recently. I wasn't too surprised to read that Joseph (Giuseppe) Li Shan was not personally opposed by the Vatican.

However, the new appointment was without Papal approval. Pontifical mandates are discussed at some length in the comments to Fr. Z's post, especially by Alex who compares the situation in Beijing to other illicitly (not according to law) consecrated Bishops of the SSPX and of Eastern European countries while under communist rule.

Also, don't forget to read that the new Beijing Archbishop is now being praised by Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican secretary of state.

Jul 15, 2007

Sexual Freedom, from a Unusual Perspective

John C. Wright is arguing about sex--and what magnificent truths he uses to whiplash the error of sexual freedom. See his most recent post, Arguements in favor of cheap women and Sex, Lies, and Shooting at the Cat, that discusses
Men who cannot keep their trousers up and women who cannot keep their skirts down.
Also don't miss the earlier post, Witnesses for the Defense, that begins with the statement
Back when I was a fun-loving, God-hating atheist, logic forced me to the conclusion that the passions of man, including sexual passions, were destructive of happiness and life unless conformed into the boundaries of reality.
and ends with reminders from historical religions and ethical systems on the great evils caused by sex unbound from marriage.

Prince of Peace Catholic Community, Olathe, KS

Prince of Peace Catholic Community is a very large church on the southwest side of Kansas City. Mostly new homes in the area means that parishioners are typically young and beginning their families. The church complex is extensive, featuring a large church, Catholic school, and a gymnasium, with large parking lots on the north and east.

The weekly church bulletin is the biggest I've seen--12 large pages, including three pages of advertisements. The bulletin indicates weekly donations at six weekend Masses exceeds $40k. Prince of Peace maintains an internet site where the altar space and small centered tabernacle can be seen.

Attendance at the 9:00 a.m. Sunday Mass included mostly white people, with a few individuals of oriental and black races. There were lots of little kids in addition to hundreds of adults that generally filled the 1,200-seat church. I thought it humorous that, even with the large parking lots of Prince of Peace, the parishioners needed to be reminded not to park across the street in the parking lot of another church.

As one enters the church, there is a large foyer/reception area with a tall statue of St. Michael the Archangel. Five individuals, including a guitarist and a violinist, led the music for the Mass while standing in front of five microphones on the left side of the church. Two women read the readings from Scripture. Three altar boys in white robes served the priest and were introduced by name at the end of Mass. Three nuns dressed in light blue habits and veils were present in one of the first few pews.

Flags of our church and our country surround the altar on which were placed six gold chalices at the beginning of Mass. The additional priest's chalice appeared to be of wood with gold accent. Simple stations of the cross are mounted on the side and rear wall of the semi-circular church. The right alcove at the front of the church holds a statue of the Virgin Mary with the baby Jesus. A representation of another saint is located in the left alcove. A large statue of the Sacred Heart of Jesus is found at the rear of the church. On each side wall are three large stained glass windows depicting Gospel scenes.

The Mass appeared to be celebrated according to the current rubrics for the Novus Ordo Mass. The homily was built around the Gospel reading and was probably less than 10 min in length. Altar bells were rung at the Consecrations, after which was sung an enthusiastic acclamation of "...Christ is risen, Christ will come again" led by loud guitar music. The priest used a very large host for the Consecration that could be easily seen from the back of the large church.

Communion was distributed by the celebrating priest and ten extraordinary ministers--five women and five men in lay attire. Several of these bowed as they themselves received communion in the hand from the priest. The consecrated hosts were distributed from gold bowls, including one very large bowl carried by the priest.

Most of the people sat down as they awaited their turn to leave their pews to receive communion. Some bowed before receiving. Only a very few people in the church did not receive communion, perhaps including non-Catholic spouses. Most people knelt in thanksgiving for a short time after receiving communion.

I thought I heard the priest say, "Let us kneel..." for the final blessing, but no one did that I saw. At the end of Mass, the priest thanked all those who had provided the music, read the Scriptures, ushered, and distributed communion. Almost everyone quickly left the Church at the end of Mass, but a few stayed to pray, including an attractive young couple with six children. People were invited to meet their fellow Catholics after Mass in a reception area, where donuts were available.

So what irritated me to my very bones? It was the young women and girls who came to Sunday Mass, supposedly to worship God, while wearing skimpy tops and shorts (all exposing most of the thighs). [The church is well air conditioned, so the reason couldn't have been the heat!] The single pew in front of me (containing a total of 18 people) had five girls and young women wearing very short shorts--and they seemed to represent at least three different groups or families.

The bulletin featured announcements for the schedule of P.O.P. R.O.C.K.S., Prince of Peace's Really Outstanding Catholic Kids, the School of Religion Enrollment (ages 3 through eighth grade), and the CORE High School Ministry. [I hope training in modesty becomes part of the curricula of all three programs. More on this subject later.]

The parish sponsors Perpetual Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament. A bulletin announcement noted that "We have over 3,200 families in our parish, yet 23 hours [of 151 hours to cover in a week] remain open. Is Jesus important enough to you to set aside one special hour each week to be with Him? Just one hour is all that He asks. This is a simple matter of putting God first in our lives." Children's Adoration is also set aside for every Sunday afternooon from 2:00 - 2:30 pm in the Adoration Chapel.