Oct 26, 2008

Zo Right!

Zo is a black Christian Republican pro-lifer AND comedian whose video machine guns fire bullets of common sense and morality at liberal targets, including abortion, Obama, and other critical moral issues.

See Zo's other videos on his website, Black and Right.

Oct 20, 2008

Pillow-less through the Election

Do you like to sleep with your pillow? I certainly do. But I've decided to be pillow-less through election day on Tuesday, November 4. The kids at St. John's Middle School in Beloit, KS have initiated a Crucial Pillow Fight:
Sleep without your pillow till the election! Redemptive suffering (Col. 1:24) is worth every toss and every turn during the night. Email us at pillowfight4life@yahoo.com to notify us of your commitment to the cause! We currently have over 450 pillow-less warriors...we need the pillow off your bed!
My mother was able to keep a straight back through her nineties by always sleeping on her back without a pillow. Even though I've tried to imitate her, I've always regressed. This time I will pursue the sacrifice with a much more rigorous attitude because of the exceedingly grave consequences of the coming election.

I've discovered that St. John's Catholic school system is unique among Catholic schools in the country. Most large cities have shut down their Catholic schools, but Beloit with only 4,000 population supports Catholic education from kindergarten through high school. Here's the website of their parish.

Another aside: Did you know that nuns in cloistered convents sleep only on their backs without pillows? At least that's what one Carmelite community told me.

Next in the US?

The blog, Surviving in Argentina, is written by a man who lives with his family in Buenos Aires, Argentina, a country that used to be the 8th richest in the world, but is now economically unstable. Wikipedia describes the Argentine economic crisis:
...many Argentines became enraged and took to the streets of important cities, especially Buenos Aires. They engaged in a form of popular protest that became known as cacerolazo (banging pots and pans). These protests occurred especially during the period of 2001 to 2002. At first the cacerolazos were simply noisy demonstrations, but soon they included property destruction, often directed at banks, foreign privatized companies, and especially big American and European companies. Many businesses installed metal barriers because windows and glass facades were being broken, and even fires being ignited at their doors. Billboards of such companies as Coca Cola and others were brought down by the masses of demonstrators.
Here's an example of what the situation is like in Argentina today, from the personal experience of the Argentinian blogger:
When I was 20 years old I lived in a 1st world country, 8 years later it’s a mixture of cheapo 3rd world tourist sites, a bit of tasteful 1900 architecture, surrounded by sights fitting either Ecuador, Colombia or some kind of war zone, and it all went to hell in a hand basket in less than a year. The change was amazing for anyone that cared to notice. Libraries, churches, town theaters, it all closed and later reopened having been replaced by bar-***** house joints, “All for 2$” shops, Bingos, casinos, self proclaimed churches, many with links to Umbanda Brazilian rituals. A perfect example of the decay in our society trough the last years.

We were wondering what is happening with your prisons in Argentina?

They are terribly overpopulated. sometiems [sic] 5X over their maximum capacity. Problems and revolts in prisons are common.

What happens when the power goes out or when the government can't afford to pay the officers to go to work?

Well, they don’t just let them go, that would be wrong, right? :) What they do, is pretend they are looking over them but granting them more liberal minded rights.
They don’t say “We can’t afford more prisoners so we let them go.” What they do is send them home with a bracelet that’s supposed to monitor the prisoner in his home.
Problem is these things don’t work, nor do cops care to control the system or the prisoner. So we end up having “prisoners” that are supposed to be under control, but they are just free to do whatever they want.


You must try by all means not to stay outside with the door opened for long periods of time. It has become clear by now that that’s when robbers attack the most. What I do. I have a front metal gate apart from the wooden garage door, both operated by remote control. I open the gate and garage door and right away start getting in , closing the gate behind me as soon as I have space. Most of the time I am armed, and I’m extra cautious at times like these just in case.


Instead of thinking of thinking about “The little house on the Prairie” scenario, a middle ages Feudal Lord-Vassal relation ship is much more accurate to depicture [sic] what small producers are going through in our own in my [sic] country, after the 2001 crisis.

So, if you are a producer with a few acres of land (less than 300/400), and you don’t have a critical mass of production , just being an extremely hard worker isn’t enough, and what is happening today to these people may happen in America in the future.

Find some market, some niche, be an entrepreneur because if you do what pretty much everyone else already knows how to do, you’ll end up working so that the middle man makes the profit, while you barely survive.

Brief Obama Biography

The most interesting and brief timeline of Barack Obama's life has just been published by Colony 14.net. If you don't have time to read anything else, this relatively short summary is comprehensive and well-documented.

Oct 17, 2008

Subprime House Foreclosure

This post is in response to the following comment I received this morning:
When people borrowed too much to pay too high of prices on property, where did all this money go? Well, the money went to ‘us’. Americans. Those who were good enough or lucky enough to sell the property when it was overvalued, when it was high, when selling was the smart thing to do. So, how can ‘we’ (America) be broke, when we still have the money? When it just changed hands from the stupid, to the smart?
Here's a true story. A widow used to live near our neighborhood. The young woman had a good job working from her home and thought the $150K home with big trees and several acres would be ideal for her three young children. She told the neighbors that she really loved the place and that the real estate agent had worked very hard to make sure she could afford to buy it. I concluded she had been able to purchase the house with a relatively small down payment and low, but variable, interest rate.

Her more frequent garage sales seemed to indicate a problem, and we did hear that her 'at home' job had ended and that she had to find another position. About this time, the interest rates on adjustable mortgages increased. Before we knew it, the widow and her children left to return to her family in California.

A "For Sale" sign was placed in her yard and remained there for eight months. During this time, the yard was not being mowed so the place was beginning to look rather bad. After almost a year, city employees mowed the yard.

The house now is in foreclosure. When one neighbor told me he had chased off three kids attempting to break into the back door, I decided to walk over to the place and see it up close. One of the large windows at the back of the house was broken. The real estate agent who formerly tried to sell the property explained that the loan bank had told him it was no longer responsible and the property had been turned over to the FHA. The agent had also been responsible for the first sale and says the original owner won't even drive by the house because he is so heart-broken over the way his formerly beautiful property now looks.

One of the nicest houses in the neighborhood now invites damage from vandals, vagrants, squatters, arsonists, and animals. Will the property likely lose a major part of its intrinsic value before it is sold? I'm no expert in real estate, but this former $150K house would probably sell today for no more than $110K.

The bank was never really interested in selling the house because it would have to show a loss on the books. The FHA is likely overburdened with foreclosures like this one and it takes a lot of time just to move the foreclosed house on the FHA/HUD list for bid. So the house just deteriorates and loses value.

One FHA foreclosure in the Greater Kansas City area shows the "as-is value" of a house is $183,000, but the asking price is $128,100--30 percent below the "as-is value." Another much cheaper house in a poorer section of Kansas City is reduced to $20,400--40 percent below the "as-is value," and this house is advertised to have an in-ground pool. All these foreclosed properties once had much higher intrinsic value because people lived in the houses and took care of them.

My correspondent asks "So, how can ‘we’ (America) be broke, when we still have the money? When it just changed hands from the stupid, to the smart?" The answer is that a good portion of property value has been permanently lost. A foreclosed house in my neighborhood is worth much less not just because of inflation/deflation/recession/depression, but because it has not been taken care of. This house (and many other foreclosed assets in our country) will be worth much less in the future if they are burned down by arson, or further damaged by vandals, vagrants, and animals. No matter how you cut it, losing intrinsic value means "going broke."

Oct 15, 2008

Research and Read It for Yourself

I've struggled how to approach some friends who have said that as Democrats they will vote for Obama. One way I'm doing that is to send them this email.
Because you have told me you will vote for Barack Obama and I know you are an intelligent reader, please do some private internet searching (googling) before November 4. Search terms should include the word "Obama" plus the following words (you can choose what you want to believe):
  1. Abortion partial birth
  2. Gay rights
  3. Acorn voter fraud
  4. "Huntley Brown"
  5. "Janet Porter" Muslim
  6. "Jeremiah Wright"
  7. "Bill Ayers" "Bernadine Dohrn"
  8. "Frank Marshall Davis" "Sex Rebel"
  9. mother mercer atheist
  10. dreams socialist meetings
  11. Occindental college record

Oct 6, 2008

Talking About Touching - Kansas City

Local Catholics should read Kansas Catholic on Talking About Touching, the so-called "safety program" created and employed in response to the scandalous sexual abuse of (mostly) young boys by Catholic priests in the U.S. Unfortunately, the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph under Bishop Finn has allowed this Planned Parenthood- and SIECUS-approved program to be introduced into some of his Catholic schools.

What really bugs me is the injustice of the system when the guilty Catholic hierarchy shoves responsibility for solving the sex abuse problem onto lay people and their children. First, it was treating all the parents like criminals to be investigated and fingerprinted if they want to work as volunteers or teachers of youth. Now, little girls and boys are assaulted by a personally invasive educational effort that places sex in the context of a dung pile. [One more injustice on top of parishioners' donations paid as damages to victims!]

Parents of children in Catholic schools should read this observation on the blog of Kansas Catholic:
Few children were abused by priests. But if all Catholic school children can be made to take part in a safety program that robs them of innocence in a different way, then the Father of Lies has someone else doing his work for him, work that reaches more than his last effort. And he even has the apparent sanction of the Church as the project moves forward.
My mother told us kids never to let anyone touch us (except the doctor when a parent was there). Modest clothing was necessary for a good reason--to protect us from bad people. Period! Why isn't that enough?

Oct 2, 2008

Your Church and the Financial Crisis

An anonymous reader wrote very good comments to my post Credit, Debit, Cash and BARTER. Please read about his/her solutions to the financial crisis that can come through the Catholic Church.

"I've always wondered if Catholic parishioners could do far more for each other than most of them typically do. As the times continue to get worse, I'm willing to bet that the Catholic Church in America will only get stronger.

For example: Pot-luck dinners could become a nightly or perhaps a thrice-weekly affair, which would certainly cut down on most folk's grocery bills. Work on parishioner's homes could be done in return for gas and oil bills; and parishioners could get together to homeschool each other's children.

A rotating staff -- some, perhaps, with CNA or RN backgrounds -- could be put to use to watch over the elderly in the parish, and could also be used to watch each other's kids while the parents are still at work. Also, a parish or a group of parishes could request group rates from the local hospitals for medical care, and group rates from the local pharmacies and medical equipment businesses.

Also, if a family has a particular need for something or some service, they could post a 'ticket' on a bulletin board, and when someone has some thing or some trade they need in return that the first family can provide or perform, their 'tickets' could be exchanged and taken off the bulletin board.


And if all that sounds too good to be true, or if it doesn't sound like that would ever happen in your parish, you might want to take a look at how the Mormons, or the Baptists organize themselves. All of these things are already being done in other faith communities.

Catholics, I believe, need to start acting like family more often. It should be a source of a very strong identification to belong to a certain parish. Once that happens, all of these things are possible.

I have witnessed far too many ugly things happen amongst Catholic parishioners than I care to mention here; and I'm afraid that it is true that most of us have a long way to go before ever realizing such things in most of our parishes. But it can be done; and as the crisis in the economy worsens, our parishioners should really start looking out for one another, to the point that we begin to act like a very strong, united community."

Sep 29, 2008

Credit, Debit, Cash and BARTER

I've never taken an economics class, but seventy years on God's good earth gives me a little knowledge of how things work. So let's rank them from worst to best, from apparent moral and economic standpoints:
  1. Credit means borrowing, with a promise to pay later. The result is that someone is a debtor and another is the debt holder. This system facilitates greed that motivates consumption. Clearly, most borrowers spend more than they should. The sin of usury may be involved (although reasonable interest is allowed because of money inflation and taxes on savings).
  2. Debit means paying with a card that automatically subtracts money already deposited to a bank account. A key reason for debit cards appears to be ease of payment and fear of theft of cash. Debit cards involve more risk than credit cards and also mean the buyer pays more for goods and services. Both credit and debit cards can lead to a totalitarian society where the state keeps track of who purchases what.
  3. Cash means paying with money/currency. This medium allows the easy and anonymous exchange of many different kinds of goods through an intermediate value established and valued by the government. Virtually every country in the world robs its citizens of their cash by printing more and more money and causing inflation.
  4. Barter means directly exchanging/trading goods and services, without the use of credit, debit, or cash. Barter establishes the true value of material, because both sides agree on what and how much to exchange. Barter usually replaces money as the method of exchange in times of monetary crisis.
Comparisons can be made with our current economic problems and bad economic situations in the past that were followed by a barter economy. The first barter exchange system was the Swiss WIR Bank. It was founded in 1934 as a result of currency shortages after the stock market crash of 1929.

In the difficult 1990s, Russians reacted by using barter (veksels and zachety were the main money surrogates). As a percentage of industrial sales, bartering steadily increased from 5% in 1992 to nearly 55% in 1998. For more information on the relatively recent Russian barter experience, see here.

I also recommend that the reader examine "Barter" in the Wikipedia Encyclopedia. You'll learn that:
  • Organized barter has grown to conduct third party bartering throughout the world to the point now where virtually every country has a formalized barter and trade network of some kind. A barter exchange provides the record-keeping, brokering expertise and monthly statements to each member. "Barter dollars" are the exchange medium.
  • Complex business models based on the concept of barter are today possible since the advent of Web 2.0 technologies.

Sep 28, 2008

Bailing Out of the Stampede

Dear Friends,

Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.

The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress’ throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect.

It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! “This is welfare for the rich,” he said. “This is socialism for the rich. It’s bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters.”

That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we’re being told it’s unavoidable.

The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!

• The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.

• Financial institutions are “designated as financial agents of the Government.” This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.

• Then there’s this: “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.

There goes your country.

Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this “sadly necessary.” Sad, yes. Necessary? Don’t make me laugh.

Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we’re supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they’re not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.

Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we’ll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.

The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?

When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?

Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.

In liberty, Ron Paul

Sep 26, 2008

TARP = TRAP

The economic situation may be akin to a 500-year flood that our country has yet to experience. Frankly, our economic problems could make the Great Depression of the 1930s look like a "summer walk in the park."

Loss of purchasing power can be expected to seriously impact anyone who has savings that can be tapped by the government through inflation. I count $1,086 B total for the following federal stimulus and bail-out programs in 2008:
  • Early 2008 economic stimulus program - $160 B
  • New economic stimulus program proposed by Democrats who control the Senate and House of Representatives - $56 B
  • Bail-out of Bear Stearns in the form of money supply inflation - $30 B
  • Bail-out of AIG in the form of money supply inflation - $85 B
  • Bail-out of Wall Street - Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP, otherwise known as (T-R-A-P) $700 B
  • Emergency funding by the Fed to central banks of Australia, Sweden, Denmark and Norway to lend to their local banks - $30 B added to an existing $247 B lifeline (announced on p 2 of "Financial Times" Sept 25, 2008)
  • Package of low-cost loans to US carmakers $25 B (expected within 2 days)
If you read nothing else today, please read the New York Times article on TARP by Andrew Ross Sorkin, "A Bailout Above the Law."

Sep 18, 2008

Sarah Palin: Why No Longer Catholic?

I've been intrigued as to the reasons why Sarah Heath Palin's parents left the Catholic faith to join an Assemblies of God church in Wasilla, Alaska in 1976. The Los Angeles Times reports that her new church required baptism by immersion, so at age 12, Palin was "re-baptized" in Little Beaver Lake west of Wasilla (lat 61.5864, lon -149.8628).

The years 1972-1976 were undoubtedly the period of greatest religious turmoil in the Catholic Church in recent history. I can't think of a post-Vatican II time period other than the early- to mid-70's that generated more problems and losses for the Catholic church in the U.S.

In an interview with TIME magazine, Sarah Palin commented on dinner discussions with her parents, Chuck and Sally Heath, who had moved to Skagway Alaska in 1964:
...my dad was an elementary school teacher [science], so often our dinner-table conversations were about current events and about those things that an elementary school teacher teaches students — much about government and much about our nation...
It is almost certain that these dinner-table conversations in the 1970s occasionally would have discussed religion, and likely critiqued the goings-on in the Catholic Church of that time. Sarah's family believes in many traditional Christian beliefs, and Sarah Palin, in many ways, acts and lives as though she were still an active Catholic.

So what was the problem? Why did Chuck and Sally Heath decide to leave the Catholic Church? According to a biography written by Kaylene Johnson, Sarah and her three siblings were each baptized into the Roman Catholic Church as infants. Consequently, during the period when all four children were born (approximately 1962 - 1966), the Heath family remained active Catholics.

What changed between 1966 (when Molly Heath their youngest child was born and baptized in the Catholic Church) and 1976 when Sarah Heath was "re-baptized" in Beaver Lake by the Assemblies of God minister?

According to the Johnson biography, the Heath family moved to Anchorage in 1969 (when Sarah was five years old) and lived for a short time with friends. They then moved to Eagle River (10 mi NE of Anchorage) before finally establishing a home in Wasilla further to the north. The move to Wasilla would have occurred before 1976 when Sarah and her family are known to have become members of the Wasilla Assemblies of God church.

So what was going on in the Catholic churches in Skagway (1964-1969), Anchorage (1969), Eagle River (1969 - ?), and Wasilla (before 1976)--during the period immediately before and during the time when the Heath family fell away from the Catholic church?

SKAGWAY: From 1964 to 1969, the Heath family lived in Skagway, Alaska, where Chuck Heath was a teacher and coach. The Skagway News shares information about Sarah Heath Palin's family while they lived in Skagway. An interesting quote shows that in 1969, when Sarah was 5, she was attending "catechism class," presumably at the very small St. Therese of the Child Jesus parish in Skagway.
“I was the same age when we left here [Skagway] as my daughter Piper is now,” she said. “I enjoyed watching her, seeing how things were through her eyes.” Palin said she used to walk “by myself – I don’t know if parents do that now –around town to the neighbors,” home from catechism [my emphasis], and remembered the wind blowing, drying the clothes in the back yard. Also going to her dad’s basketball games – he coached the [Skagway] high school team.
Sarah Palin would have been a five year old catechism student in 1969. Thus, the Heath family remained practicing Catholics while they lived in Skagway. It is clear that only after the Heath's left Skagway in 1969 did they stop practicing their Catholic faith. Although other things in the Skagway Catholic community may have loosened the Heath's grip on their Catholic faith.

A relatively recent photo from the Skagway News in 2001 identifies Assembly of God Pastor Steve Smith preaching to those assembled for the Easter sunrise service at Pullen Park. The caption notes the Presbyterian Church and St. Terese Catholic Church joined with the Assembly of God to celebrate Easter, 2001. My comment: Perhaps this interdenominational scene may have played out much earlier in Skagway under the observation of the Heath family.

In 2002 the Diocese of Juneau (in which Skagway is located) had only 5,500 Catholics of a total 74,000 population, with 13 priests to serve the people. The first bishop appointed to serve the Juneau diocese, Robert Dermot O'Flanagan, was born in 1901 in Ireland and served as Bishop of Juneau from 1951 until his resignation on June 19, 1968. The history of the Juneau diocese notes that between 1968 and 1971, the Juneau diocese was remotely administered by the new Archbishop of Anchorage, Joseph T. Ryan. [Francis Thomas Hurley was not appointed to head the Juneau diocese until July 1971, two years after the Heath family had left Skagway.]

So would Bishop O'Flanagan have attracted or repelled the Heath family from 1964 to June 1968 when he resigned as Bishop? A historical vignette shows Bishop O'Flanagan as a down-to-earth individual who much resembled the hardworking Heath's:
During his early years he could be seen shoveling snow off the walks in the winter and in the summer cleaning up trash in the yard. He wore a pair of coveralls when he was doing his work stoking a wood burning furnace in the cellar of the church and raking up the yard. The ladies of the parish were worried about him not getting enough to eat or eating the right food.
The Heath family stayed in Skagway for approximately a year after Bishop O'Flanagan's retirement in June 1968. No scandals are documented as happening in the Catholic church of Skagway while the Heath family resided there, but 1967-1969 was the time when massive changes began to be instituted in virtually all the Catholic churches in the world. The only other observation is that the small Skagway church may have had no resident pastor during this time, because in 1991 the parish was said to be served by visiting priests.

ANCHORAGE/EAGLE RIVER/WASILLA: The Heath family lived in Anchorage for only a short time at their friend's house, so it appears likely they left the Catholic Church while living in Eagle River and Wasilla (although earlier damage to their faith may have occurred while they lived in Skagway). Did the Heath family encounter something scandalous or destructive of faith in the Anchorage diocese when they moved there in 1969, especially after they moved to Eagle River and then to the Wasilla?

I wonder if part of the answer might be Fr. (Msgr) Frank Murphy who worked in parishes around Anchorage from 1960 to 1985. In 2004 a high school principal in Eagle River publicly accused the priest of a sexually abusive incident committed in 1982. Pat Podvin had exposed the priest in a dramatic television interview, and then committed suicide in 2005. Four other men also have said Murphy abused them as youngsters, including Podvin's older brother Kent. Here is an excerpt of the sad article from the Anchorage Daily News :
On Feb. 6, 2003, Podvin appeared in a televised interview with Channel 2's Maria Downey and declared he had been sexually abused as an 18-year-old by Monsignor Frank Murphy, a priest who worked in parishes around Anchorage from 1960 to 1985. Podvin said he was going public because the Anchorage Archdiocese had failed to acknowledge that any local priest had sexually abused youngsters here, and he was also critical of retired Archbishop Francis Hurley, to whom he complained about Murphy in 1982 but who never personally responded afterward until after he went public.
The appalling story of Fr. Murphy's sexual assaults of young boys in the Anchorage Archdiocese over many years is told in gross detail in another article from the Anchorage Daily News. One wonders if Sarah Heath's older brother, who would have been ten years old in 1972, encountered this abusive priest.

For myself, I likely would not have stayed active in any Anchorage Catholic church if I had had to live under Archbishop Francis T. Hurley who began his rule in Juneau in 1971 and then was appointed to Anchorage in 1976. The Woodstock Theological Center identifies Francis T. Hurley of the Anchorage Archdiocese as one of the 15 Archbishops recommended to the Pope for appointment by the infamous Jean Jadot, the Vatican's apostolic delegate to the U.S in the 1970s:
Under Jadot, 15 archbishops were appointed: William D. Borders to Baltimore, Patrick F. Flores to San Antonio, Peter L. Gerety to Newark, James A. Hickey to Washington, Raymond G. Hunthausen to Seattle, Francis T. Hurley to Anchorage, Oscar H. Lipscomb to Mobile, Edward A. McCarthy to Miami, John L. May to St. Louis, Edward T. O'Meara to Indianapolis, John R. Quinn to San Francisco, John R. Roach to St. Paul, Charles A. Salatka to Oklahoma City, Robert Sanchez to Santa Fe, and Rembert G. Weakland to Milwaukee.
Traditional Catholics recognize many of the above archbishops as clear enemies of the Catholic Church. The actions of these archbishops resulted in massive defections from the Catholic church in the 1970s and 1980s--both of priests and people. Fortunately, these archbishops have been replaced and the Catholic church is beginning to grow again in spirituality and numbers.

So what did the Heath's do with regard to their religious practices in the mid to late 1970's? The Johnson biography states: "With or without her husband, Sally bundled up the kids and took them to church every Sunday for morning and evening services and most Wednesdays too." Of course, that reference was to the Assemblies of God church--not a Catholic church.

Obviously, only the Heath family can answer the question of why they abandoned the Catholic church in the 1970s. I hope they identify their reasons as they understood them at the time they joined the Assemblies of God church in Wasilla.

**Photograph of little Sarah Heath is reprinted with express permission from the biography by Kaylene Johnson published by Epicenter Press of Alaska-- SARAH: How a Hockey Mom Turned Alaska's Political Establishment Upside Down. This photograph is copyright 2008 by Chris and Sally Heath who reserve all rights; please don't republish photograph elsewhere on the internet without obtaining their express permission in advance.

Sep 17, 2008

Gardening for Deer

This year, the garden has a bumper crop -- of DEER! I don't see them in the day, but they turn on the backyard light at night. The deer I saw at 3:15 am was ambling along the fence where I planted new thornless blackberries this spring.

The evidence of deer is reflected in these photos of destruction in my garden, vineyard, and orchard.

1. Thornless blackberry plants which have had to regrow their leaves several times this summer after being eaten by deer.


2. Concord grape vines with many missing leaves that were munched by deer during the past three weeks.














3. Apple tree with bottom apples and leaves that are gone. Yes, some of those lower-hanging apples were eaten by grandchildren, but not all. Even the antleered one [NOT a grandchild!] is willing to come out from hiding to eat the apples!

Sep 14, 2008

Proposed Revisions to the Novus Ordo Mass

The Ordo Missae White Book (OMWB) published by ICEL (marked "Study Text Only") was posted on the American Catholic Bishops website over a month ago. I've briefly looked at these proposed modifications to the English translation of the Sacred Liturgy of the Mass.

Here's an abbreviated list of my complaints about the Novus Ordo Mass (NOM) and how/if the OMWB proposes to fix the problems. [A prior post discussed the serious deficiencies of the NOM and gives a key reference.]
  1. The NOM English"formula of general confession" is a very poor and virtually unrecognizable translation of the Latin original which it was supposed to follow. OMWB proposes a somewhat better wording, including correctly adding "through my fault, through my fault, through my most grievous fault..."
  2. The NOM Consecration of Jesus' blood uses the words "for all" while all extant versions of the New Testament (over 20) translate Christ's words as "for many." OMWB corrects this extremely serious problem by replacing "for all" with "for many."
  3. The NOM-introduced "Mystery of Faith" proclaimed by the priest immediately after the Consecration distracts focus from the True Presence of Jesus on the altar. OMWB proposes no change and leaves the people's acclamations to refer to Jesus' future coming at the end of the world and ignoring the fact that He is now present.
  4. The NOM-introduced "Sign of Peace" distracts from the True Presence of Jesus on the altar, especially because it is placed between the Consecration and Communion. OMWB makes the "Sign of Peace" optional, but does not propose moving it to the beginning of Mass.
  5. The NOM-eliminated Last Gospel (John 1:1 thru 1:14) no longer instructs Catholics with key truths about Jesus' Divinity. OMWB does not propose restoring the Last Gospel to the Mass.
The ICEL-recommended changes approved by Rome ,and now being considered by the American bishops, are first attempts to rectify the disastrous changes to the Mass that occurred after Vatican II, and I applaud this start. But because other serious issues remain in the Novus Ordo Mass, I will continue to attend the old Latin Mass.

Sep 5, 2008

How do You Return to the Church?

Many Catholics have fallen away from believing in and practicing their faith during the past 40 years. More and more are finding their way back home, but some wonder how difficult it is to return and what procedures must be followed.

Several years ago I listened to Jack Cashill give a public speech in which he talked about returning to the Catholic Church after an absence of many years. He described meeting a good priest at a reception and learning what it would take to return to the faith of his fathers.

Does anyone know the simple answer the priest gave him? Hint: it takes only about fifteen minutes, and afterwards, the reinstated Catholic knows he is far more favored and blessed by God than the long-time faithful Catholic in the next pew.

Answer: The only thing that is necessary to return to grace and truth in the Catholic faith is to go to confession, which means to be sorrowful for your sins, admit your sins to a priest, and do the penance that the priest gives you. Is it difficult to remember sins committed over 10, 30, and even 50 years ago? Not too bad if all you have to do is answer the priest's questions. Jack said the priest who admitted him back in the Church and heard his confession simply asked him how many times he had committed particular sins.

Priests know how difficult it is for a person to confess their sins after an extended time because memory fails and there may be embarrassment. That is why the priest asked Jack Cashill how many times he had committed a particular sin. The audience laughed with humble self-awareness when he admitted "about 1,300 times, Father!"

I'd like to personally welcome home all our lost brothers and sisters. I know you've been through hell during your time away from the City of God [St. Augustine].

Sep 3, 2008

Do You See the Difference?


Thanks to Michelle Malkin for this observation.

Learning the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite Mass

The Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) has been training many priests during the past year to offer the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite Mass. I've been wondering about the results, and found a good example. A favorite blogger and science-fiction author and new Catholic (Easter 2008), John C. Wright, identified a particularly good sermon and I was curious about the homilist:
One Fr. John De Celles [STL], speaking in Old St. Mary's Church this weekend, delivered a homily to rebuke Nancy Pelosi, who publically offered a gross distortion of the Catholic teaching on aborticide. It is, if you will, the modern version of St. John the Baptist rebuking Herod, another figure who saw nothing wrong in slaying innocent children.
Wright noted that the entire sermon given on Labor Day weekend has been posted on the web. I read it and am very impressed. So who is Fr. John De Celles whose sermons are so good that one will be picked up and reprinted by the well-respected National Review magazine?

The current Bulletin of St. Mary's Church reports that Fr. De Celles now offers the old Latin Mass in Alexandria, VA:
You may recall that last summer Father attended a week-long seminar to learn how to say this Mass. He attended another seminar this summer to both review the rubrics of the Traditional Mass and to focus on the High Mass. In addition he put a lot of time and energy into preparing for [offering the Extraordinary Form on] August 15th.

Those efforts paid off in many ways. We expected some people would attend the evening Mass on the 15th simply because it fit their schedule. We did realize a few might have had no idea this would be the Traditional Mass despite weeks of announcing that it would be. And we thought a number would attend because it was a sung High Mass.

We estimate that there were 600 people here that night. The overwhelming response was a positive one, actually an extremely positive one, which was wonderful to hear. It provided, as we hoped, an opportunity for parishioners to experience the beauty of the “Old Mass.”
The FSSP priests are seeing a lot of good results from their training other priests to offer the old Latin Mass. In addition, I've noted over the years that the best prepared homilies seem to come from priests who are favorable to the old Mass.

Sep 1, 2008

Todd Palin--American Manhood at its Best

What's the story behind the Alaska governor with an approval rating of 89 to 93 percent? A good part of it has to be her husband, Todd Palin, who is discussed in ALASKA magazine of February 2008. Here are a few quotes from the cover story, "Palin's Way," by Melissa DeVaughn on "America's Hottest Governor."
It's her favorite room [kitchen] in the large but unpretentious home her husband, Todd, designed and built five years ago.... Todd's floatplane is docked just a hundred yards away [on Lake Lucille] at the edge of the neatly mown lawn....Having such a high-powered wife does not faze Todd, who refers to himself jokingly as the "First Dude."

While Sarah does the work of governor, Todd remains the quintessential Alaska man. He stays busy with his week-on, week-off job with British Petroleum on the North Slope. He's also one of the state's best snowmachiners, and has won the grueling 2,000-mile Tesoro Iron Dog race four times. In the summer, Todd fishes a commercial site in Bristol Bay and spends time flying his airplane, a hobby he has enjoyed for 20 years.

Having his wife become governor changed the Palin household, he said, but not in a monumental way. "Her schedule dictates my schedule, but with her being mayor for so many years, we were already used to it," he said. "The kids are very adaptable. There are thousands of Alaska families that adapt, whether you're a contract guy who's gone for the summer season, a sloper or in the military, we have a lot of families who don't have the 9-to-5 schedule."

On this day, Todd Palin is preparing to change into work clothes and help oversee construction of a community playground in Juneau. As First Dude, he is a champion of vocational education for Alaska students. "I'm a product of on-the-job training that was offered to me in 1989. And growing up in the high schools that I attended, we had great shops, mechanic shops and carpenter shops. In recent years, that has not been a high priority, but that is coming back. So I've told the commissioner of labor, 'Wherever you can use me in that role, I am there for you'."

"My slope job has provided for my family," he said. "when an opportunity is given to an individual, it is what that person does with it that matters. As I travel the state, that's a big concern, getting kids motivated. I am meeting kids that can't read a tape measure or just don't want to work, so it's the same message wherever we go. Step out. Once you step out and are given an opportunity, you can change a life"

Todd's family is spread from Bristol Bay to Homer.... when [daughter] Bristol revealed she spent $20 on leg waxing--'That was supposed to be gas money,' Todd Palin said disapprovingly [and Sarah Palin concurred!]
So what I learned about Todd Palin is that he is at least as good an individual as Sarah Palin--likely even better as he is a very strong and loving husband and father! The governor of Alaska seems to know that too, as she introduced Todd to the country as "the man she admires the most in this world."

Here are some other things I've found out about Todd Mitchell Palin in searching the web:
Personally I applaud Todd Palin for being the best example of American manhood that I can imagine.

Aug 30, 2008

Gov. Sarah Palin - Experience Needed?

Gov. Sarah Palin is clearly well-liked by the people of Alaska because she has an 80+ percent favorable rating. But does she have adminstrative and foreign policy experience? Clearly, Gov. Palin is a very competent administrator, with more leadership experience than Barack Obama and Joe Biden put together. Here's an abbreviated list of past and current leadership duties of Gov. Sarah Palin:
  • Managing the extensive resources of State and City personnel and offices
  • Appointing qualified people to carry out the laws and direct the policies of Alaskan city and state government
  • Conducting public relations campaigns to manage and market Alaskan resources
  • Evaluating and signing (or vetoing) bills passed by Alaska legislators
  • Serving as the commander-in-chief of the Alaska National Guard
  • Preparing and delivering reports on Alaska to the Legislature and to other interested parties
  • Estimating the amounts of money required to be raised by taxation, preparing and recommending City and State budgets, and holding firm to her goal of financial balancing of income and expenses
  • Assuring the Alaskan people of honesty and ethics in State government
A comparative list of experience and achievements between Palin and Obama is given here. Moreover, I don't worry about whether Vice-president Sarah Palin has a lot of experience in foreign policy, because all administrators of complex institutions rely on knowledgeable advisors and consultants. U.S. foreign policy decisions always are preceeded by well-studied proposed policy documents, followed by meetings with key advisors whose differing perspectives create the necessary background for a final decision by the President. [One of my distant cousins is one of those policy advisors, in that some of his documents dealing with the Middle East have made it to the desk of the President.]

Gov. Sarah Palin already is quite knowledgeable about China and other PAC-RIM countries that buy the majority of Alaskan products. She also is highly concerned about new Russian interests and impacts, including near the North Pole. Alaska has recently been impacted by unauthorized Russian flights that intrude into U.S. airspace.

My personal belief is that McCain's four-time bout with melanoma eventually will become a five-time bout and he will not survive his complete term. That would put Gov. Sarah Palin into the White House. Here's what our oldest son wrote about Gov. Sarah Palin:
"She appears to be the most 'likable' of the four major Pres/Vice Pres candidates. This may have been a stroke of genius on the part of McCain, time will tell. The democrats' reaction strikes me as confused and ridiculous so far. I don't think they were ready. She is not the type of person you can attack head-on and walk away looking very good. I'm feeling better about the Republican ticket's chances in November already. Looking toward the future, I'd give her a greater possiblity of being President of the United States someday than Hillary."
Vice-president Sarah Palin will need to select good advisors, just as President Reagan did in the 1980's. For starters, I'd recommend Pat Buchanan who seems to have some of the best insights on foreign policy, including Russian, Chinese, and Middle East problems.

Aug 28, 2008

Demagogy, Change, and Utopian Promises

H.L. Mencken was right when he defined a demagogue as "one who will preach doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." I might change that definition a little: "one who makes promises he knows can't be fulfilled to TV viewers he knows to be forgetful idiots."

I listened to part of Barack Obama's acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention and suggest people should read his speech, rather than just listen to it. Obama promised everything but the moon to the American people, and I was reminded of Fidel Castro as he came to power many years ago.

Obama is a fantastically good speaker whose impassioned public speeches appeal to the emotions, fears, and expectations of many people. Here are a few excerpts of promises made tonight by Obama--unrealistic Utopian promises. Notice that Obama mostly uses the personal pronoun "I" in his promises for change. [Do people no longer remember the old saying, "Out of the frying pan into the fire!" meaning to go from a bad situation to one that's even worse?]
So let me spell out exactly what that change would mean if I am president...

I will cut taxes -- cut taxes -- for 95 percent of all working families. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class. [How does Obama define "working families" and "middle-class." "Economy like this" also gives him an 'out'. ]

And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as president: in 10 years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East. [Yes, but please tell us how much less energy our country will be using at the end of ten years?]

I'll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America. I'll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I'll invest $150 billion over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy -- wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and 5 million new jobs that pay well and can't ever be outsourced. [This paragraph should be re-read a third time! Does Obama have plans to unseat Congress, control wages, run businesses, and add 5 million new jobs to the federal payroll?]

Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education... [If w-c implies the best education that money can buy, not every student can or will absorb a w-c education.]

I'll invest in early childhood education. I'll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support.... [What's wrong with current teachers? Does Obama really mean an ARMY of new teachers drafted into federal government service?]

Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American. If you have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. [Just like in Canada, where my friend's father would have died because it takes months to get Canadian permission for open-heart surgery. Instead, he came to San Antonio for the surgery.] If you don't, you'll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves. [Get ready for more medical tourism.] And as someone who watched my mother argue with insurance companies while she lay in bed dying of cancer, I will make certain those companies stop discriminating against those who are sick and need care the most.

Now is the time to help families with paid sick days and better family leave, because nobody in America should have to choose between keeping their jobs and caring for a sick child or ailing parent. [Who's going to pay? Private companies already are struggling to stay alive while competing with India, China, and other developing countries.]

Now is the time to change our bankruptcy laws, so that your pensions are protected ahead of CEO bonuses.... [Translated: Bankruptcy laws need to be more lenient so that people who have spent themselves into deep debt can be relieved of their promises to pay what they borrowed. Uninsured medical expenses will be used to justify the easing of bankruptcy laws, although the changes will apply to every debtor who simply bought too much using their credit card.]